Friday was a big day to get insight into the Supreme Court’s analysis of President Biden’s authority to impose sweeping vaccine mandates. The court began hearing arguments on two cases about vaccine mandates or testing requirements; one for healthcare workers.
Beginning Monday, unvaccinated employees in companies with 100 or more employees are supposed to wear masks indoors at work unless the court blocks the enforcement. “Testing requirements and potential fines for employers don’t kick in until February” reports the Chicago Tribune.
Chief Justice John Roberts said of the cases at hand, “this is something the federal government has never done before” which is indicative of their “casting doubt on the administration’s argument that a half-century established law the Occupational Safety and Health Act, confers such broad authority” writes the Chicago Tribune.
The court’s three liberal justices appear adamant on their support for the rule. Justice Elena Kagan said officials have shown “quite clearly that no other policy will prevent sickness and death to anywhere like the degree that this one will.” Justice Stephen Breyer said he found it “unbelievable” that it could be in the “public interest” to put that rule on hold.
The Chicago Tribune reports it was the first time seven justices chose to wear masks while hearing arguments. Liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who has been diabetic since childhood, chose to take part remotely in her office so as not to risk exposure to COVID-19’s latest omicron variant. Also two lawyers representing Ohio and Louisiana had to give their arguments via telephone after testing positive for COVID.
mandates are not laws, freedom of choice
The Supreme is becomingconfused. The evidence of abuse of power a d overreach is very clear. Did they FOGET WHAT THEIR OATH &CONSTTUTION IS.
THIS IS GOI G TO START A REVOLUTION. THEY HAVE FOGOTTEN. WE THE PEOPLE CONTROL THE GOV.
THERE ARE SOOOOOO MANY MORE OF US THAT THERE ARE OF THEM. YOUR MOVE, STEP CONSTITUTIONALLY!
No one not even the federal government has no right in our constitutions to enforce any mandate on anyone this is an abuse of power in this administration and all of you need to be replaced with someone who has sense enough to know that the American people see through all of the democractics satan rules that they are trying to enforce on the Americsn people. I believe what you democrats do not underdtand is all of you can and will be replaced this coming election because the republicans democrats and even liberals are getting sick of all the crap that you people think you can do. Remember you work for the American people as elected officials not the American people for you TRUMP 2022
They need to go by the Law on record now NOT THEIR OPINION!!! Opinion
is not law!!!
It’s SCOTUS job to interpret law not to legislate it. We are not ruled by a king or dictator. There is no due process for a mandate. Also the violators of 1/6 are not being afforded their right to q speedy trial. We are in a time where the government disregards the constitution and the will of We The People.
HONG KONG FLU – No mask
TUBERCULOSIS – No mask
SARS – No mask
BIRD FLU – No mask
SWINE FLU – No mask
REGULAR FLU – No mask
ELECTION YEAR – Quarantine, mask hysteria.
So, if liberal justices have their preference, if President comes up with what they conclude is good government policy that benefits the public, then he can just wave his magic wand and make it so? No involvement of Congress? No deference to states rights and individual rights? The U.S. Constitution offers no guidance in the matter? The issue is not whether it is a good idea. Rather, is it constitutional.
The one issue that I have not heard anyone argue is that these laws violate the equal protection clause because they exempt the employees of the vaceene companies, the postal workers union members, members of Congress and their staff, White House staff , and members of the Judiciary. This is a clear violation of the equal protection clause and that disparity should not be allowed to stand. The exceptions are made in order to keep members of those groups from speaking out publicly against the mandate. If they really believed that the vaccines are both safe and efficacious oh, they should be first in line to get them.
I already stated one argument that I have not heard made and here is the second. The government needs a very strong compelling interest if it is going to do anything that could infringe on rights. For example it can seize private property for a public good such as building a road as long as it pays for it at a market rate. There is no compelling interest enforcing citizens to be vaccinated unless the vaccine stops the spread of the virus, which it does not do. So what is the interest of the government in this case other then seeing its citizens give in to their demands? There can be no compelling interest if the vaccine does not do what it is intended to do which is to stop the spread of the virus.
Nobody cares what they “believe ” what we want to hear is if it’s illegal to mandate putting poison into people against their wishes. And if they don’t then forcing them to live as second class citizens. Even though it’s indisputable the vaccine is not FDA approved, doesn’t prevent anyone from getting or spreading the virus and is not the only solution to preventing the spread. It’s just the only one lobbyists paid congress to promote.
This is not constitutional. Mandates are not law and should be used to encourage people to do something but not force anyone against their will I find this forcing me to either ware a mask or take a jab of a so called vaccine a violation of my civil rights under the constitution
They don’t care about the constitution if they go along with the idiots mandates.
THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION DOES NOT HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO DEMAND WHAT AMERICAN CITIZENS GET PUT IN THERE BODIES. ITS FREEDOM OF CHOICE. THAT IS GUARANTEE BY THE U.S. CONSTITUTION.
ITS NOT ABOUT A VACCINE ITS ABOUT FREEDOM OF WHAT GOES IN OUR BODIES.
THEY WANT TO TAKE AWAY OUR BASIC FREEDOMS. DO NOT ALLOW THIS TO STAND UP IN COURT.
BECOMING confused? Where have you been?