According to the main stream media and many other Hunter Biden defenders, all the charges against him and his father are bogus and the whistleblowers coming forward are lying. The U.S. Attorney David Weiss recently gave a sweetheart deal of no jail time to Hunter Biden and the media will have you believe that this isn’t corrupt, or coercive or deceitful in any way.
The main argument against the plea agreement was who was in charge of handing down the plea agreement? Was it actually the U.S. Attorney Weiss or was it by the the higher-ups in the Department of Justice that were following orders from the President, his dad.
According to whistleblower, Gary Shapley. he testified before Congress there is now proof of such an arrangement. “In an October 7, 2022 meeting at the Delaware U.S. Attorney’s Office, U.S. Attorney David Weiss told six witnesses he did not have the authority to charge in other districts and had thus requested special counsel status.”
The testimony continued, “Those six witnesses include Baltimore FBI Special Agent in Charge Tom Sobocinski and Assistant Special Agent in Charge Ryeshia Holley, IRS Assistant Special Agent in Charge Gary Shapley and Special Agent in Charge Darrell Waldon, who also independently and contemporaneously corroborated Mr. Shapley’s account in an email, now public as Exhibit 10.”
“Mr. Shapley would have no insight into why Mr. Weiss’s would make these statements at the October 7, 2022 meeting if they were false. That Mr. Weiss made these statements is easily corroborated, and it is up to him and the Justice Department to reconcile the evidence of his October 7, 2022 statements with contrary statements by Mr. Weiss and the Attorney General to Congress,” stated the summary of the whistleblower testimony.
The six witnesses will now need to testify before Congress to either confirm or deny Shapley’s testimony.
According to the Attorney General, Merrick Garland, he already went public during a press conference saying these allegations were false.
“As I said at the outset, Mr. Weiss, who was appointed by President Trump as the U.S. Attorney in Delaware and who was assigned this matter in the previous administration, would be permitted to continue his investigation and to make a decision to prosecute any way in which he wanted to, and in any district in which he wanted to,” Garland said. “I don’t know how it would be possible for anybody to block him from bringing a prosecution given that he ever has this authority.”
Congress now has to sort the fact from the fiction and who is actually telling American’s the truth?
In a column from legal scholar Johnathan Turley, he wrote “that means that Garland was not just hearing from experts and members of Congress calling for an appointment, but that Weiss himself also saw the need for such an appointment.”
“Moreover, the report indicates that others in the investigation believed that there was a need to create such separation from the Justice Department in light of what they viewed as the special treatment given the president’s son.” He also described that if these allegations are true, it would explain a lot. “These accounts could explain why the Justice Department took five years to secure a guilty plea to two misdemeanors that could have been established in the first month of the investigation.”
“It would explain why there is no evidence of serious investigation into the influence peddling or a charge under FARA. It would explain why Hunter’s lawyer cannot recall ever being asked about the laptop. It would explain why the problem is not the Justice Department’s motto, but the man who is tasked with fulfilling it,” he wrote.
American’s are beginning to see through the lies and the whistleblowers accounts are beginning to add up. Garland may be lying to cover for the President.
“Now, we haven’t been able to, obviously, authenticate this information, but what we do know is that these are people that made statements to congressional investigators under the threat of prosecution if they lie. And that comes with an element of credibility. It doesn’t mean you have to accept it as true,” Turley concluded.